Alpers v. Bliss
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to vacate a dismissal by plaintiffs, and refusing to vacate a judgment of dismissal, and from the clerk’s judgment of dismissal. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
This action was brought in 1878 by Charles Alpers and Laura A. Mowry, against eighteen defendants, for the partition of a tract of land in San Francisco. The plaintiff's, in addition to setting forth facts authorizing a judgment for the partition of the tract, alleged that they had for a long time occupied and made improvements upon a particular lot within the tract, less in extent than that to which they were entitled, and asked that in the partition that lot be set off to them. George D. Bliss, one of the defendants named in the action, demurred to the complaint, and on February…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wiggin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Borland v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Roylance v. DoelgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.