Legal Opinion

Angus v. Craven

California Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1901No. S.F. No. 1458PublishedCited by 53 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Charles W. Slack, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

— This is an appeal by the defendant, Nettie R. Craven, from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and the intervener. Appellant made a demand for a jury for the trial of “said cause,” which was refused; and the only question presented on this appeal is, whether she was entitled to have “said cause” tried before a jury. Persons other than appellant were originally made defendants; but by defaults, disclaimers, etc., they disappeared from the case, and need not be further noticed, and in hereafter stating the pleadings we will treat them, for convenience, as if Mrs. Craven were the only defendant.

I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Curtis v. SutterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Donahue v. MeisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Remington Paper Co. v. . O'DoughertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Newman v. DuaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Montana Ore Purchasing Co. v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Connell v. BowesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Jaffe v. Albertson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API