Legal Opinion

Holland v. Kelly

California Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1917No. S. F. No. 7571PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of Julia McCarthy, defendant’s testate.

The suit was brought to obtain a judgment declaring a certain deed null and void and decreeing that it be canceled. Plaintiff also asked that the court should make a decree declaring him to be the owner of the property described in the deed; quieting his title as against Julia McCarthy; and enjoining the latter from asserting any estate, right or title to the land. There was also a prayer for general relief.

The deed in question was made by Mary Anne Holland, Patrick Holland’s intestate, to Julia McCarthy,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Angus v. CravenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Warring v. FreearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Pomeroy v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Petroleum Midway Co. v. ZahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Sheldon v. La Brea Materials Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Lenard v. EdmondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API