Taylor v. Hawley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Since the commencement of this action the interest of the original plaintiffs in the property in litigation was transferred to Jacob George, who subsequently died. Upon proceedings duly had William J. Taylor was ap*578pointed and qualified as executor oí the estate of Jacob George, deceased. William J. Taylor, as such executor, has been substituted as plaintiff. This appeal will therefore be determined in the name of William J. Taylor, as Executor of the Estate of Jacob George, Deceased, v. Fred B. Hawley and Elsie J. Hawley, Husband and Wife.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment which was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wolf v. GallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Coleman v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Rocha v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Holland v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- M.F. Farming Co. v. Couch Distributing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Brewer v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.