Legal Opinion

Samaniego v. City of Kodiak

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2003No. S-10378PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Julia Samaniego sued the City of Kodiak, Kodiak Police Sergeant William D. Marsh, and Officer Milton Bohac, alleging that Sergeant Marsh and Officer Bohac used excessive force in arresting her. At trial, one of Kodiak’s psychiatric experts, Dr. Stephen M. Raffle, was permitted to testify about his diagnosis of Samaniego. The superior court prohibited Samaniego from questioning Sergeant Marsh about a possible bias stemming from a settled employment dispute with the City of Kodiak. Samaniego appeals from the judgment entered on the jury verdict in favor…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Buster v. GaleAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. City of Kodiak v. SamaniegoAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Finney v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  4. Marsingill v. O'MALLEYAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Bethel v. PetersAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API