Marron v. Stromstad

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Teva Marrón and Lyle Stromstad were involved in an automobile accident, for which Stromstad admitted fault. Marrón sued for damages, particularly compensation for medical treatments, that she claims arose from the accident. The only issue at trial was causation, and the trial consisted largely of expert testimony. The jury found for Strom-stad and the court awarded him costs and fees. On appeal Marrón claims the superior court made a variety of discovery, evidentia-ry, and procedural errors. We affirm the superior court’s decisions on all issues except…