Finney v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez
T1 Section 16-11-206, C.R.S. (2018), requires a court to advise a probationer, at or before the commencement of a hearing on a revocation complaint, of the possible penal*1047ties he may face. In this case, we consider whether, to satisfy due process, Crim. P. 11(b)(4) independently requires a court to advise a probationer of the possible penalties he faces when he admits to a violation of a deferred judgment agreement.1 Here, the record reflects that the defendant waived his statutory right to an advisement at his revocation hearing. The record also reflects that, prior to his revocation hearing,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. MoodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Bostelman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Steven M. Asherman v. Larry Meachum, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- in Int. of B.HSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- People v. HardColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- McCracken v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Makeen v. HaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.