Legal Opinion

Finney v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 27, 2014No. Supreme Court Case No. 12SC276PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez

T1 Section 16-11-206, C.R.S. (2018), requires a court to advise a probationer, at or before the commencement of a hearing on a revocation complaint, of the possible penal*1047ties he may face. In this case, we consider whether, to satisfy due process, Crim. P. 11(b)(4) independently requires a court to advise a probationer of the possible penalties he faces when he admits to a violation of a deferred judgment agreement.1 Here, the record reflects that the defendant waived his statutory right to an advisement at his revocation hearing. The record also reflects that, prior to his revocation hearing,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. MoodySupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. Bostelman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Steven M. Asherman v. Larry Meachum, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. in Int. of B.HSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  2. People v. HardColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
  4. McCracken v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. Makeen v. HaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API