Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Glamann v. Kirk

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2001No. S-9362PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

David Glamann was injured when Gloria (Caler) Kirk's automobile rear-ended his automobile. Kirk admitted negligence but disputed the extent of her liability. CGlamann did not respond to Kirk's $50,000 offer of judgment, and the case went to trial,. A jury awarded Glamann $10,000.

Glamann appeals the trial court's decisions to: (1) admit evidence of malingering, (2) give an aggravating-cause jury instruction, (8) deny the motion for a new trial, (4) disallow Mary lamann's wage loss claim, and (5) award Kirk attorney's fees. Because we conclude that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hutchins v. SchwartzAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Heritage v. Pioneer Brokerage & Sales, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Hibpshman v. Prudhoe Bay Supply, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Marron v. StromstadAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Heller v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API