Legal Opinion
Buster v. Gale
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1994No. S-5020PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. FACTS AND LOWER COURT PROCEEDINGS
In June 1984 James Gale, Thomas Wester-hof, and Mary Westerhof (Gale and the Westerhofs) executed a deed of trust in favor of Cameron Milliron and M. Jo Milliron (the Millirons), as security for an obligation of $44,000. The signatures of Gale and the Westerhofs were notarized, and the deed of trust was recorded.
Jack Buster (Buster) argues that Gale and the Westerhofs additionally signed a deed of trust note (the note), in which they assumed the $44,000 debt to the Millirons. The Milli-rons assigned the note to Robert Baines and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Francis J. McQueeney v. Wilmington Trust Company, Trustee, and Anndep Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re the Proceeding Under AS 22.30.070(c) in Relation to JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.