Legal Opinion

City of Bethel v. Peters

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2004No. S-10864PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal of a jury verdict in a tort suit against the City of Bethel presents the question whether recommendations for action contained in a post-accident report are ex-cludable as subsequent remedial measures under Alaska Rule of Evidence 407, the question whether the superior court properly submitted the issue of severe disfigurement to the jury, and a question concerning inappropriate arguments during the plaintiffs closing. Because the superior court did not err in its rulings, we affirm the judgment.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Factual History

On July…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Maddox v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Clary Insurance Agency v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Benitez-Allende v. Alcan Aluminio do Brasil, S.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Barton v. North Slope Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Greene v. TinkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Jeffries v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API