Legal Opinion

State v. Coon

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1999No. S-6893PublishedCited by 124 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A jury found George Coon guilty of making three terroristic telephone calls. We must decide whether the superior court erred in admitting opinion evidence, based on a voice spectrographic analysis, that Coon made those calls. Applying the Alaska Rules of Evidence and the standard for admitting novel scientific opinion evidence, articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), we hold that it was not error to admit that evidence, and affirm Coon’s…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by124 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. People v. ShreckSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API