Legal Opinion
Weadon v. Shahen
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1942No. Civ. 2965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment restrain ing the sale of plaintiffs’ property under an execution issued on a judgment rendered in the case of Edward Rainey, Superintendent of Banks of the State of California v. Clarence C. McIntosh and Metta McIntosh. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss this appeal. Defendant Shay is sued in his official capacity as Sheriff of San Bernardino County. Hereafter we will refer to Elias Shahen as the defendant.
Prior to September 17, 1936, Clarence C. McIntosh and Metta McIntosh were indebted to the San Bernardino County Savings Bank which had been taken over by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. VerdugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Garstang v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Mitchell v. Alpha Hardware & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Keele v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Bacilio v. City of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Brown v. OvershinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Wightman v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.