Frink v. Roe
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The tax deed referred to in the opinion was offered in evidence by the plaintiff, and excluded. It recited that the tax collector offered the land at public auction as one parcel, instead of offering the smallest quantity which any purchaser would be willing to take and pay the tax. The further facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action of ejectment to recover a portion of South Beach block, No. 25, of the city and county of San Francisco.
*300Defendants had judgment, from which and from an order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals.
The appeal was heard by Department Two of this court, and a judgment of reversal rendered June 29, 1885. Upon petition, a hearing in bank was ordered, and after oral argument and filing of additional briefs, the cause is again presented for decision.
At the trial, the plaintiff, for the purpose of proving title in himself, introduced in evidence the judgment roll, etc., in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- M'Crea v. PurmortCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
- Brush v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Chapman v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.