Legal Opinion

Wightman v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1988No. A031798PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

I

Introduction

By this taxpayers’ action (Code Civ. Proc., § 526a), 1 appellants Rebecca Wightman (Wightman), Claude Malcolm Thompson (Thompson), and Jacqueline Jackson (Jackson) challenge the withholding of their state income tax refunds by respondents Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and the State Controller 2 pursuant to Government Code section 12419.5. 3 Section 12419.5 provides in part that “[t]he Controller may, in his discretion, offset any amount due a state agency from a person or entity, against any amount owing such person or entity by a state agency. . . . [1f] For…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API