Legal Opinion

Verdugo Ca&209on Water Co. v. Verdugo

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1908No. L.A. No. 1797PublishedCited by 54 opinions

APPEAL by plaintiffs from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial, and by the defendant, E. M. Boss, from parts of the judgment. M. T. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiffs herein appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The defendant, E. M. Ross, appeals from certain parts of the judgment. All the appeals are presented upon the same record.

The action is by the Verdugo Cañón Water Company and some three hundred other persons, who are its stockholders, to determine and quiet title to certain water-rights claimed by them in a stream of water flowing in the Verdugo Cañón, and to enjoin the defendants from taking the water alleged to belong to the plaintiffs.

It is alleged that the plaintiffs, other than the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. Southwest Cotton Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API