Legal Opinion

Brown v. Overshiner

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1952No. L. A. No. 22185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The petitioner, as public guardian of the county of Los Angeles, seeks through the office of the writs of mandate and prohibition to have determined the respective duties and obligations of the petitioner as public guardian, his predecessor in office the respondent Chas. L. Overshiner, *434and the respondent superior court, upon the consolidation by the county board of supervisors of the offices of public guardian and public administrator.

Effective December 1, 1945, the board of supervisors by ordinance established the office of public guardian pursuant to section 5175 of the Welfare and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Guardianship of SalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. San Diego County Department of Social Services v. CabanneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API