Searl v. Shell Oil Company
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
The complaint herein seeks recovery upon two causes of action: (1) for an amount representing rebates or loss of profits alleged to have been earned on the purchase of certain quantities of gaso line; and (2) for rentals alleged to be due and owing under a lease of a gasoline station. By its cross-complaint, defendant seeks recovery of a small balance owing for gasoline sold and delivered. Issues having been joined between the parties, the action was tried before the court, sitting without a jury, and resulted in finding’s and conclusions favorable to defendant, upon which judgment was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kanaskat Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Shell Oil Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Tacoma Mill Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Thomson & Stacy Co. v. Evans, Coleman & EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Shell Oil Co. v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Ferguson v. Associated Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.