Legal Opinion

Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & Jeffery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1914No. 11516PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 14, 1913, upon findings in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff sold defendant certain dredging machinery, under the terms of the following writing:

“6-12-11 Order to Al H. Hoffman, Spokane, Washington. Charge to name: Holt & Jeffery, Seattle, Washington . . . One one and one-half yard Fairbanks Dredge with fifty foot boom, and iron for vertical spuds complete, F. O. B. Marion, price: $6,050.00; machinery to be overhauled at factory and put in first class shape. Delivery of machinery from factory to cars not later than sixty days from date. Plans to be furnished for scow immediately. Delivery of machinery from factory not later than sixty days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Torgeson v. HanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Interstate Engineering Co. v. ArcherWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Ramming v. CaldwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  4. Smith v. BolsterWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Kanaskat Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cascade Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Washington Fish & Oyster Co. v. G. P. Halferty & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Elston v. McGlauflinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. CodigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API