Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of California

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1936No. 25872. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beals, J. —

During the year 1928, Arthur G. Johnson engaged in business in the city of Everett as the proprietor of a grocery store and automobile service station. On May 28th of that year, he entered into a “service station lease agreement” with Shell Oil Company of California, a corporation, one of the defendants herein, and, on December 7th following, the parties signed a supplemental contract, designated as “license and consignment contract.” By the earlier of the two contracts, plaintiff rented his service station to the defendant company for three years from August 1, 1928, the lease…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Light & Water Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Washington Central Improvement Co. v. NewlandsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Zilke v. WoodleyWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Robinson v. Shell Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Johnson v. Shell Oil Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API