Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Thomson & Stacy Co. v. Evans, Coleman & Evans

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1918No. 14285PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered February 19, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover, on three causes of action, damages for delay in delivery of Calcutta grain sacks purchased by it from defendant under three separate contracts. The contract upon which the first count is predicated reads as follows:

“Vancouver, B. C., December 1st, 1915.
“Evans, Coleman & Evans, Limited.
“Messrs. Thomson Stacy Co.,
“Tacoma, Wash.
“We have entered your order for the following goods:
*278“Fifty bales each 1,000 Standard Calcutta grain sacks, 36"x22"—12 oz.
“Price. 8%c per sack ex. steamer Seattle—Tacoma. X.

‘ ‘ Terms. Cash on delivery.

“Delivery. Second half June, 1916.
“This sale…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Telluride Power Transmission Co. v. Crane Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Engelhorn v. . ReitlingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. R. J. Menz Lumber Co. v. E. J. McNeeley & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Freeto v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Hopkins v. BarlinWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Leavenworth State Bank v. Cashmere Apple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Dennison v. HardenWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Alaska Pacific Salmon Co. v. MatthewsonWashington Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API