Legal Opinion

Bond v. Wiegardt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1950No. 31046PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

John L. Wiegardt and Fred W. Wiegardt, discovering that, through inadvertence, they had planted oysters on a state oyster reserve, desired to claim these oysters as their personal property. To assist them in prosecuting their claim, they retained, as attorneys, Fred M. Bond and the late W. H. Abel. Discussions were had concerning the amount of attorneys’ fees, and, on or about August 20, 1945, Mr. Bond prepared a draft of a proposed contract of employment and sent four copies thereof to the Wiegardts. Upon receipt of the papers, the Wiegardts, without affixing their signatures to any of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Buck v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Duplex Envelope Co. v. Baltimore Post Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Reiner v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Retail Clerks Health & Welfare Trust Funds v. Shopland Supermarket, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Myers v. HarterWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Becker v. Lagerquist Bros., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Insurance v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1953

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API