Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Associated Oil Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1933No. 24313. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought for an accounting and to have a deed declared to be a mortgage. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment to the effect that the deed was not a mortgage, and that, on the accounting feature, the plaintiffs were entitled to $583.57. From this judgment, the plaintiffs did not appeal, and the defendant appealed from that part of the judgment so far as the accounting was concerned.

The facts may be summarized as follows: For some years prior to March 3, 1928, Mike Ferguson and Claude Ferguson operated a gasoline service station at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ramp Buildings Corp. v. Northwest Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. O.P.R.R. Co. v. . ForrestNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Robinson v. Shell Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Deibel v. Jefferson BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arlington Towers Land Corp. v. John McShain, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1957
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API