Legal Opinion
Kanaskat Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Cascade Timber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1914No. 11781PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered December 6, 1913, dismissing an action on contract, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This action was brought by plaintiff, as assignee of one Charles E. Hill, to recover damages for failure to deliver cedar logs under a contract, the material parts of which follow:
“Whereas Charles E. Hill of Tacoma, is about to erect a shingle mill adjacent to the tracks of the railroad owned by the Cascade Timber Company, Now Therefore, it is agreed by and between the Cascade Timber Company, a corporation, party of the first part, and said Charles E. Hill, party of the second part, as follows, to wit: The party of the first part agrees to furnish to the party of the second part all the cedar…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parks v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Excelsior Wrapper Co. v. MessingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Sultan Railway & Timber Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Myers v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Garrity's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. CodigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Dopps v. AldermanWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Tacoma Mill Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.