Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. Wright

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1932No. 23377. En BancPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

On May 24, 1928, respondent leased the service station of appellants in Tacoma, Washington, for five years. The lease provided:

“The rental for said premises shall be adjusted to a sum equivalent to two cents for each and every gallon of Shell gasoline purchased during the month for each and every month during the term of this lease. The lease will be credited each and every month with said rental on a merchandise statement issued for the following month’s business; that is, rental for the month of August will be credited on September’s statement.”

At the same time, respondents subleased the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tingley v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. La Plante v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hunters Cattle Co. v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Inman v. W. E. Roche Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. McManus v. SawyerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Jewell v. Shell Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Searl v. Shell Oil CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Marks v. KucichWashington Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API