Legal Opinion
Middlesex Insurance v. Quinn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 19, 1992No. 10356PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
This appeal presents the narrow issue of whether an automobile insurer can exclude from uninsured motorist coverage a family member who lives in the insured’s household and owns a vehicle not covered by the insured’s policy. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that it may do so.
The named defendant, James J. Quinn III,1 appeals from the trial court’s decision vacating an arbitration panel’s award in his favor and denying his application to confirm it. The defendant claims that the court improperly found that he is not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits because he is not a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Middlesex Insurance v. QuinnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Kent v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ZasunConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Dobuzinsky v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.