Kent v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.

This case requires us to decide whether General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175C1 entitles an insured to aggregate the underinsured2 motorist coverage for two vehicles covered under one automobile liability insurance policy if the insured had paid an actuarially appropriate single premium for the underinsured motorist coverage and the policy language expressly excludes the aggregation of coverage. This issue was referred initially to an arbitration panel pursuant to the terms of the policy. A majority of that panel determined that, in the circumstances of this case, the underinsured motorist…