Legal Opinion
Middlesex Insurance v. Quinn
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 30, 1993No. 14575PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the defendant, James J. Quinn III, is a covered person under the terms of an automobile liability insurance policy issued by the plaintiff, Middlesex Insurance Company (Middlesex), to the defendant’s father, James J. *259Quinn, Jr.1 Following the trial court’s judgment vacating an arbitration award of $83,333 rendered in favor of the defendant, the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Middlesex Ins. Co. v. Quinn, 27 Conn. App. 573, 609 A.2d 1008 (1992). We granted the defendant’s petition for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Malo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- American States Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Middlesex Insurance v. CastellanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Kent v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Gormbard v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ZasunConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.