Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 17, 1990No. 13780PublishedCited by 310 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

The plaintiff, Seymour Hammer, brought an action against the defendant, Lumberman’s Mutual Casualty Company, for its alleged failure to continue to provide lifetime disability payments in accordance with the terms of the group disability insurance policy issued to the plaintiff by the defendant. The defendant moved for summary judgment on the basis of an exclusion in the policy that limits benefits to two years if the total disability was caused by or resulted from “medical or surgical treatment.” In granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court held, inter alia, that…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Catz v. RubensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by310 opinions

  1. Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Rich v. Principal Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API