Legal Opinion
Dobuzinsky v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 14, 1998No. AC 17278PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiffs, Judith Dobuzinsky and George Dobuzinsky, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their application to vacate, correct or modify an arbitration award issued to resolve a dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendant, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company, concerning the plaintiffs’ entitlement to uninsured motorist benefits. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly confirmed the arbitrators’ award, which failed (1) to apply the limits of the uninsured motorist coverage separately to the plaintiff George Dobuzinsky’s claim and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Covenant Insurance v. CoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. ZasunConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Town of Westbrook v. ITT Hartford Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Renz v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Admiral Insurance Company v. Versailles Medical Spa, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Dobuzinsky v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.