Legal Opinion
Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 14, 1991No. 14100PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The plaintiff, Elizabeth A. Chmielewski, executrix of the estate of Robert E. Chmielewski, appeals, and the defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court that: (1) modified an underinsured motorist coverage arbitration award in favor of the plaintiff; and (2) remanded to the same arbitration panel an issue of coverage under an excess coverage policy that the arbitrators had not determined.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court: (1) violated her constitutional rights to due process of law and access to the courts by failing to…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.