Legal Opinion
Streitweiser v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 25, 1991No. 14239PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The dispositive issue reserved for our advice in this case is whether this state’s legislative policy mandating insurance protection for someone injured by an identifiable uninsured motorist extends *373to an accident caused by an unidentified vehicle that has no physical contact with the injured claimant. The plaintiff, William Streitweiser, brought an action to vacate an arbitration award that had denied his claim for uninsured motorist coverage under a policy issued by the defendant, Middlesex Mutual Assurance Company. The trial court, in accordance with the parties’ stipulation of the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hertz Corp. v. Federal InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.