Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that upheld SAIF’s denial of his right knee condition. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.482(8), and reverse and remand.
We summarize the facts from the board’s order and the record. Claimant has worked for employer as an air conditioning and ventilation installer since 1982. In October 1998, claimant was renovating an air conditioning system, a job that required him to squat and kneel for long periods of time. On October 8,1998, as claimant got up from a squatting position, he felt a sharp pain in his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- People v. RivasSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Cummings v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Spurger v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Allied Waste Industries, Inc. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.