Brown v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding the denial of his combined-condition claim based on the board’s determination that SAIF Corporation (SAIF) had established that claimant’s accepted lumbar strain is no longer the major contributing cause of his combined condition. The facts are not in dispute. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7), ORS 183.482(7), (8), and reverse and remand for reconsideration.
We take the facts from the administrative law judge’s (AL J’s) findings of fact, which the board adopted and which SAIF does not challenge. Claimant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- SAIF Corp. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-MaciasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Akins v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Carrillo v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Easton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.