Legal Opinion

Spurger v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2014No. 1006324; A150351PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) that denied her compensation for what she maintained was a “chronic condition impairment” of her left hip under OAR 436-035-0019. That order concluded that claimant had failed to demonstrate that she was “significantly limited in the repetitive use” of her hip such as would entitle her to compensation under that rule. Claimant contends that the board erred in failing to either identify or apply a proper interpretation of the term “significantly limited.” Because we conclude that the board’s order is not…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Schleiss v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Broeke v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Spurger v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Wiggins v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API