Legal Opinion

Dietz v. Ramuda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1994No. 92-09712; CA A81010PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of his claim for compensation for a heart attack that occurred after he was exposed to smoke while on the job. We affirm.

Claimant, who was 63 years old at the time of hearing, worked at employer’s meat processing plant for 18 years. In January, 1992, during the course of his work, he breathed smoke from an electrical fire for approximately seven minutes. Within a few minutes of the exposure to the smoke, he began to cough, was nauseated and felt chest pain. He was taken to the hospital where it was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mathel v. Josephine CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Closet Maid v. SykesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. SAIF Corp. v. StrubelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Cummings v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Robinson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Jackson County v. WehrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API