Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 23, 1988No. WCB 86-02776; CA A45124PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
The petition for judicial review in this workers’ compensation case was filed on July 27, 1987. HB 2900 was approved by the Governor on July 20, 1987, and filed in the office of the Secretary of State on July 21, 1987. It became Oregon Laws 1987, chapter 884. Section 12a amended ORS 656.298(6) by eliminating the language imposing on this court an obligation to conduct de novo review in workers’ compensation cases and by providing, instead: “Review shall be as provided in ORS 183.482(7) and (8).” Section 12b provides: “The amendments * * * by section 12a * * * do not apply to appeals [sic] of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Home Plate, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Joseph v. LoweryOregon Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Brown v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Portland Ass'n of Teachers v. Multnomah School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Castro v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.