SAIF Corp. v. Nehl
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
SAIF Corporation moves for reconsideration of our previous opinion, SAIF v. Nehl, 148 Or App 101, 939 P2d 96(1997), contending, inter alia, that “some of the language of the court’s opinion appears to apply [ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B)] in a manner inconsistent with the court’s prior opinions.” We allow the motion to clarify our opinion and to respond to SAIF’s argument that our opinion in this case is inconsistent with our opinion in Robinson v. SAIF, 147 Or App 157, 935 P2d 454 (1997), which we decided after oral argument in this case and cited in our previous opinion. We adhere to our opinion as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robinson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by14 opinions
- Closet Maid v. SykesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48JOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Worldmark the Club v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.