Legal Opinion

Armenta v. PCC Structural, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2012No. 0701193; A141790PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board) upholding employer’s denial of occupational disease claims for cervical radiculopathy and lumbar radiculopathy. Claimant contends that the board erred in finding that an expert opinion admitted into evidence for purposes of rebuttal did not address any condition at issue and therefore would not be considered in determining whether claimant’s work activities were the major contributing cause of his claimed conditions. Specifically, claimant asserts that, although the expert addressed claimant’s alleged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Young v. Hermiston Good SamaritanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Freightliner Corp. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. SAIF Corp. v. PepperlingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Asten-Hill Co. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keystone RV Co.-Thor Industries, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Minor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Minor)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. InteliStaf Healthcare v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API