Cummings v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) upholding SAIF corporation’s denial of his claim for compensation for a combined low back condition. We reject, without discussion, all of claimant’s arguments with the exception of those pertaining to the persuasiveness of a medical report prepared by Dr. Richard Matteri. Because we agree with claimant that the board’s explanation for upholding the denial based on Matteri’s insurer medical evaluation (IME) is not supported by substantial reason, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.
The facts are largely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Boeing Company v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mize v. Comcast Corp-AT & T BroadbandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Luton v. Willamette Valley Rehabilitation CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- O'CONNOR v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Okon v. BroadspireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.