Legal Opinion

Bell v. Staacke

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1903No. L.A. No. 1155PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff brought this action to have a trust declared in his favor against the defendant Staacke in ten thousand acres of land in Santa Barbara County, the title to which stood of record in the name of the latter, and to compel a conveyance thereof to him by Staacke. The defendants, Staacke individually, and Theresa Bell, as executrix of the estate of Thomas Bell, deceased, by answer and cross-complaint, set up that said lands were held by said Staacke, subject to a trust in favor of the estate of said Thomas Bell, for certain advances made by said Thomas Bell in his lifetime, at the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Stuart v. LordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Jones v. Goldtree Bros. Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Crow v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API