Stuart v. Lord
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The suit was brought to recover for services rendered to the defendant’s intestate from January 26, 1897, to January 26, 1899, at which latter date the intestate died. It is alleged that the servicess were worth the sum of thirty-five dollars per month. The court found that the plaintiff rendered services to the intestate as housekeeper, cook, and general farm servant for the time alleged “at the fixed price of fifteen dollars per month, and the proceeds of the butter and eggs from the farm of the said” deceased, and upon the issue of payment the court found that her work and services…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- In Re HatchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Knight v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Roche v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Landis v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.