Legal Opinion
Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1902No. S.F. No. 2205PublishedCited by 30 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion. Page, McCutchen & Bells, and Page, McCutchen, Harding & Knight, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This case was tried in the court below, with a jury, and a verdict rendered for plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The action was brought to recover the royalty on the sale of dynamo-electric machines by defendant under the terms of a contract made with plaintiff. The contract in the verified complaint is alleged as follows:—
“That, heretofore, to wit, on the 3d day of November, 1886, the plaintiff, being the inventor of a certain invention for a dynamo-electric machine, upon due…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Johnston v. LanducciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.