Legal Opinion
Seymour v. Oelrichs
California Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1909No. S.F. No. 4767PublishedCited by 229 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
An opinion was filed on this appeal on July 6, 1909, and judgment given thereon as follows: “The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.” The following is a copy of said opinion, the same having been written by Justice Sloss:
“In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $28,500 as damages for the breach of a contract of employment. He alleges that on or about the 1st day of May, 1902, the defendants Theresa A. Oelrichs and Virginia Vanderbilt, with their brother Charles L. Fair, since deceased, were the heirs at law of James G. Fair, deceased, and the owners of his estate,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Shoemaker v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Anderson v. HubbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by229 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.