Legal Opinion

Bell v. Staacke

California Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1902No. L.A. No. 1155PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

The respondent moves to dismiss the appeals herein taken from the judgment and also from the order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial.

The ground of the motion to dismiss the appeal taken from the judgment, among others, is, that the notice of appeal was prematurely given, being served and filed on the eighth day of July, 1901, and that the final judgment and decree in said action was entered on the ninth day of July, 1901, and not before that day. The showing in support of the motion establishes the fact very clearly that the judgment in the case was entered July 9, 1901, and not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Knowlton v. MackenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Chester v. Bakersfield Town Hall Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bohannon Dredging Co. v. EnglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Baldwin v. Santa Rosa Island Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API