Bell v. San Francisco Savings Union
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, and from orders denying motions for a new trial. J. W. Taggart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, and in the decisions therein referred to.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action involves the rights of the parties in two tracts of land in Santa Barbara County containing, respectively, ten thousand and four thousand acres. Many of the facts here presented have been before this court in Bell v. Staacke, 141 Cal. 186, [74 Pac. 774], and 151 Cal. 544, [91 Pac. 322], and we refer to the opinions on those appeals for a general history of the transactions leading up to this litigation.
The present action was brought by Kate M. Bell, James L. Crittenden, and Sidney M. Van Wyclc, Jr., claiming as successors in interest of John S. Bell, against the San Francisco…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Spruce v. WellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Pacific States Corporation v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Deiter v. KiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.