Dawson v. Schloss
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial.. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action for malicious prosecution on a charge of perjury in verifying an answer in an action by Schloss and others against Dawson and others. On the first trial, plaintiff recovered a judgment against both defendants for the sum of five thousand dollars and costs. A new trial was granted to Schloss alone.
The new trial resulted in a verdict and judgment against Schloss for three thousand dollars, and Schloss alone appeals from this judgment against him, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
Both trials were by jury, and the judgment against Hinkle remains in force,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Livingston v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1806
- Harkrader v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Urton v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Eddelbuttel v. DurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People v. LopezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Ball v. GussenhovenMontana Supreme Court · 1904
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.