Legal Opinion

Crow v. Crow

California Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1914No. Sac. No. 2105PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action to set aside a deed made by Emma J. Crow to her grandnephew B. P. Crow to 1157 acres of farm land in Stanislaus County of the admitted value of fifty thousand dollars. The deed was executed on the twenty-first day of December, 1910. The grantor was a childless widow over seventy-seven years of age. The grantee had been the business manager of her properties and had farmed for her on shares this particular piece of land. Close relations of trust and confidence existed between them. The complaint charged the procurement of the deed by defendant through his own fraud in which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Soberanes v. SoberanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. De Arellanes v. ArellanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. In Re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. Canadian Indus. Alcohol Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Herbert's Laurel-Ventura Inc. v. Laurel Ventura Holding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Mazuran v. StefanichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Smarda v. Fruit Growers' Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API