In Re Estate of Parker
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order' of the Superior Court of Orange County allowing attorney’s fees for extraordinary services in a probate proceeding. Z. B. West, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
This is an"appeal by Raymond E. Hoyt, as the attorney for the executrix in the above-entitled estate, from an order of the court below granting in part only a petition for fees for extraordinary services rendered and extraordinary expenses incurred by said attorney in behalf of said estate. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1616.) The petition in question prayed for an allowance in the sum of $311.35, of which. $16.35 was for extraordinary expenses and the remaining $295 was claimed as a charge for extraordinary services rendered hy petitioner to the estate. The court helow upon a hearing of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freese v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Adams v. Bank of WoodlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Baker v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Treadwell v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by21 opinions
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Reynolds v. FraysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Estate of SchererCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.