Adams v. Bank of Woodland
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. N. A. Hawkins, Craig & Hawkins, and Thomas B. Bond, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Elizabeth Adams, the executrix of the will of deceased, filed her final account, asking for its settlement and allowance. The Bank of Woodland, a creditor of said estate, filed a written contest as to certain items of the account. Findings were filed and a decree entered allowing the account and the contested items. This appeal is from the decree and an order denying a new trial. It is claimed that the court erred in allowing the executrix the item of $4,295 for the use of her steam-engine and harvester for the years 1890 to 1893. The main argument urged in support of this…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Blake v. PegramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Freese v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re Estate of ParsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Guardianship of Di CarloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Estate of De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.