Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Fraysher

California Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1956No. L. A. 23995PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Charlie Ella Fraysher, a widow, died leaving a small estate and an holographic will, which gave to each of her children $1.00, except for her daughter Georgia Reynolds, to whom she bequeathed “the Place & all Households articulare.” It is agreed that this bequest meant the deceased’s home, appraised at $2,500, and the furnishings therein, appraised at $100, which property constituted the principal assets of the estate. Pursuant to the will, the deceased’s son, David N. Fraysher, was appointed the executor. When the executor, a resident of Oregon, sought approval of his first account and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Parsons v. EastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Estate of BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API